🟡 CVE-2025-4021: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-4020: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-32472: The multiScan and picoScan are... 🟡 CVE-2025-4019: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-4018: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-4017: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4016: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4015: A vulnerability was found in 2... 🟡 CVE-2025-4014: A vulnerability was found in P... 🔥 CVE-2025-3200: An unauthenticated remote atta... 🟡 CVE-2025-4013: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4012: A vulnerability was found in p... 🟡 CVE-2025-4011: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-42598: Multiple SEIKO EPSON printer d... 🟡 CVE-2025-39367: Missing Authorization vulnerab... 🟢 CVE-2025-32471: The device’s passwords have no... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32470: A remote unauthenticated attac... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4007: A vulnerability classified as ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-22235: EndpointRequest.to() creates a... 🟡 CVE-2025-4006: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4005: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4004: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4003: A vulnerability was found in R... 🟡 CVE-2025-4002: A vulnerability was found in R... 🟡 CVE-2025-4001: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-4000: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3999: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3998: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3997: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3996: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3706: The eHRMS from 104 Corporation... 🟡 CVE-2025-3995: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3994: A vulnerability was found in T... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3993: A vulnerability was found in T... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3992: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3991: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-31144: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... ⚠️ CVE-2025-27937: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... 🔥 CVE-2025-26692: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3990: A vulnerability, which was cla... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3989: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-46690: Ververica Platform 2.14.0 allo... 🟡 CVE-2025-46689: Ververica Platform 2.14.0 cont... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3988: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3987: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3986: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-3985: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-46688: quickjs-ng through 0.9.0 has a... 🟡 CVE-2025-46687: quickjs-ng through 0.9.0 has a... 🟢 CVE-2025-3984: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-3983: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3982: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3981: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟢 CVE-2025-2866: Improper Verification of Crypt... 🟡 CVE-2025-3980: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3979: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3978: A vulnerability was found in d... 🟡 CVE-2025-3977: A vulnerability was found in i... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46657: Karaz Karazal through 2025-04-... 🟡 CVE-2025-3976: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-3975: A vulnerability was found in S... 🟡 CVE-2025-3974: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3973: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3972: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3971: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3970: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3969: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-3968: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-3967: A vulnerability was found in i... 🟡 CVE-2025-3886: An issue in CatoNetworks CatoC... 🟡 CVE-2025-3966: A vulnerability was found in i... 🟡 CVE-2025-3965: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3964: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3963: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2024-52888: For an authenticated end-user ... 🟢 CVE-2024-52887: Authenticated end-user may set... 🟡 CVE-2025-3962: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3961: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3960: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3959: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3958: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3957: A vulnerability was found in o... 🟡 CVE-2025-3956: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46580: There is a code-related vulner... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46579: There is a DDE injection vulne... 🟡 CVE-2025-46578: There are SQL injection vulner... 🟡 CVE-2025-46577: There is a SQL injection vulne... 🟡 CVE-2025-46576: There is a Permission Manageme... 🟡 CVE-2025-46575: There is an information disclo... 🟡 CVE-2025-46574: There is an information disclo... 🟢 CVE-2025-46675: In NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2... 🟢 CVE-2025-46674: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 us... 🟡 CVE-2025-46673: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 do... 🟢 CVE-2025-46672: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 do... 🟡 CVE-2025-3955: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟢 CVE-2025-46656: python-markdownify (aka markdo... 🟡 CVE-2025-3954: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-46655: CodiMD through 2.5.4 has a CSP... 🟡 CVE-2025-46654: CodiMD through 2.2.0 has a CSP... 🟢 CVE-2025-46653: Formidable (aka node-formidabl...
Malicious Go Package Backdoor Remains Undetected for Over Three Years

Malicious Go Package Backdoor Remains Undetected for Over Three Years

In a significant software supply chain security incident, a malicious Go package impersonating the widely-used BoltDB database module remained undetected for more than three years, potentially compromising numerous systems.

Discovery of the Malicious Package

Security researchers from Socket Security uncovered a backdoored typosquat of the BoltDB package. The legitimate BoltDB, hosted at github.com/boltdb/bolt, is a popular key/value store for Go. The malicious actor created a similarly named package at github.com/boltdb-go/bolt, aiming to deceive developers into downloading the compromised version.

Mechanism of the Attack

The attacker exploited Go's module proxy caching mechanism. After publishing the malicious package, it was cached by the Go Module Mirror service, which stores modules indefinitely to enhance reliability. Subsequently, the attacker altered the Git tags in the repository to point to a clean version, making manual inspection appear benign. However, developers fetching the package via the Go Module Proxy continued to receive the cached malicious version, facilitating persistent distribution of the backdoored code.

Impact and Implications

The backdoored package contained a backdoor that enabled remote code execution, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands on infected systems. While the exact number of affected developers is unclear, the incident underscores the risks associated with typosquatting and the challenges posed by immutable caching mechanisms in package management systems.

Recommendations for Developers

To mitigate such risks, developers are advised to:

  • Verify package names and sources carefully before inclusion in projects.
  • Regularly audit dependencies for any unauthorized or suspicious changes.
  • Utilize security tools designed to detect malicious packages and typosquatting attempts.

Staying vigilant and implementing robust security practices are essential to safeguard against supply chain attacks in the software development ecosystem.

Sources

Back to Posts