🟡 CVE-2025-5337: The Slider, Gallery, and Carou... 🟡 CVE-2025-5238: The YITH WooCommerce Wishlist ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4667: The Appointment Booking Calend... 🟡 CVE-2025-6070: The Restrict File Access plugi... 🔥 CVE-2025-6065: The Image Resizer On The Fly p... 🟡 CVE-2025-6064: The WP URL Shortener plugin fo... 🟡 CVE-2025-6063: The XiSearch bar plugin for Wo... 🟡 CVE-2025-6062: The Yougler Blogger Profile Pa... 🟡 CVE-2025-6061: The kk Youtube Video plugin fo... 🟡 CVE-2025-6055: The Zen Sticky Social plugin f... 🟡 CVE-2025-6040: The Easy Flashcards plugin for... 🟡 CVE-2025-5589: The StreamWeasels Kick Integra... 🟡 CVE-2025-5336: The Click to Chat plugin for W... 🟡 CVE-2025-4592: The AI Image Lab – Free AI Ima... 🟡 CVE-2025-4216: The DIOT SCADA with MQTT plugi... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4200: The Zagg - Electronics & Acces... 🟡 CVE-2025-4187: The UserPro - Community and Us... ⚠️ CVE-2025-5487: The AutomatorWP – Automator pl... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3234: The File Manager Pro – Fileste... 🟡 CVE-2025-6059: The Seraphinite Accelerator pl... ⚠️ CVE-2025-33108: IBM Backup, Recovery and Media... ⚠️ CVE-2025-25215: An arbitrary free vulnerabilit... ⚠️ CVE-2025-24919: A deserialization of untrusted... 🟡 CVE-2025-6083: In ExtremeCloud Universal ZTNA... 🟡 CVE-2025-49598: conda-forge-ci-setup is a pack... ⚠️ CVE-2025-25050: An out-of-bounds write vulnera... ⚠️ CVE-2025-24922: A stack-based buffer overflow ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-24311: An out-of-bounds read vulnerab... 🟢 CVE-2025-49597: handcraftedinthealps goodby-cs... 🔥 CVE-2025-49596: The MCP inspector is a develop... 🟡 CVE-2025-49587: XWiki is an open-source wiki s... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49586: XWiki is an open-source wiki s... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49585: XWiki is a generic wiki platfo... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49584: XWiki is a generic wiki platfo... 🟡 CVE-2025-49583: XWiki is a generic wiki platfo... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49582: XWiki is a generic wiki platfo... 🟢 CVE-2025-6052: A flaw was found in how GLib’s... 🟡 CVE-2025-6035: A flaw was found in GIMP. An i... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49581: XWiki is a generic wiki platfo... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49580: XWiki is a generic wiki platfo... ⚠️ CVE-2025-48920: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-48919: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-48918: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-48917: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-48916: Missing Authorization vulnerab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-48915: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-48914: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🔥 CVE-2025-6030: Use of fixed learning codes, o... 🔥 CVE-2025-6029: Use of fixed learning codes, o... ⚠️ CVE-2025-36633: In Tenable Agent versions prio... ⚠️ CVE-2025-36631: In Tenable Agent versions prio... 🔥 CVE-2025-28389: Weak password requirements in ... 🔥 CVE-2025-28388: OpenC3 COSMOS v6.0.0 was disco... 🔥 CVE-2025-28384: An issue in the /script-api/sc... ⚠️ CVE-2025-28382: An issue in the openc3-api/tab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-28381: A credential leak in OpenC3 CO... 🟡 CVE-2025-46096: Directory Traversal vulnerabil... 🔥 CVE-2025-46060: Buffer Overflow vulnerability ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-49468: A SQL injection vulnerability ... 🔥 CVE-2025-29902: Remote code execution that all... 🟢 CVE-2025-48825: RICOH Streamline NX V3 PC Clie... 🔥 CVE-2025-46783: Path traversal vulnerability e... 🟡 CVE-2025-36506: External control of file name ... 🟡 CVE-2025-6012: The Auto Attachments plugin fo... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39240: Some Hikvision Wireless Access... 🔥 CVE-2024-38824: Directory traversal vulnerabil... 🟡 CVE-2025-5923: The Game Review Block plugin f... 🟡 CVE-2025-22242: Worker process denial of servi... 🟡 CVE-2025-22241: File contents overwrite the Vi... 🟡 CVE-2025-22240: Arbitrary directory creation o... ⚠️ CVE-2025-22239: Arbitrary event injection on S... 🟡 CVE-2025-22238: Directory traversal attack in ... 🟡 CVE-2025-22237: An attacker with access to a m... ⚠️ CVE-2025-22236: Minion event bus authorization... 🟡 CVE-2024-38825: The salt.auth.pki module does ... 🟢 CVE-2024-38823: Salt's request server is vulne... 🟢 CVE-2024-38822: Multiple methods in the salt m... 🟡 CVE-2025-4229: An information disclosure vuln... 🟢 CVE-2025-4227: An improper access control vul... 🟡 CVE-2025-5815: The Traffic Monitor plugin for... ⚠️ CVE-2025-5282: The WP Travel Engine – Tour Bo... 🟡 CVE-2025-5950: The IndieBlocks plugin for Wor... 🟡 CVE-2025-5939: The Telegram for WP plugin for... 🟡 CVE-2025-5938: The Digital Marketing and Agen... 🟡 CVE-2025-5930: The WP2HTML plugin for WordPre... 🟡 CVE-2025-5928: The WP Sliding Login/Dashboard... 🟡 CVE-2025-5926: The Link Shield plugin for Wor... 🟡 CVE-2025-5841: The ACF Onyx Poll plugin for W... ⚠️ CVE-2025-5491: Acer ControlCenter contains Re... 🔥 CVE-2025-5288: The REST API | Custom API Gene... 🟡 CVE-2025-5233: The Color Palette plugin for W... 🟡 CVE-2025-5123: The Contact Us Page – Contact ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4586: The IRM Newsroom plugin for Wo... 🟡 CVE-2025-4585: The IRM Newsroom plugin for Wo... 🟡 CVE-2025-4584: The IRM Newsroom plugin for Wo... ⚠️ CVE-2025-47959: Improper neutralization of spe... ⚠️ CVE-2025-30399: Untrusted search path in .NET ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4232: An improper neutralization of ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4231: A command injection vulnerabil... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4230: A command injection vulnerabil...
How Threat Actors Exploit Brand Collaborations to Target Popular YouTube Channels

How Threat Actors Exploit Brand Collaborations to Target Popular YouTube Channels

In recent times, cybercriminals have intensified their efforts to compromise popular YouTube channels by masquerading as reputable brands offering collaboration opportunities. This deceptive tactic aims to exploit the trust that content creators place in well-known companies, leading to significant security breaches.

The Attack Vector

The typical attack sequence involves:

  1. Initial Contact: The attacker sends a professionally crafted email, posing as a representative of a reputable brand, proposing a collaboration or sponsorship deal.
  2. Malicious Attachment: The email includes a link to a file hosted on a trusted platform like OneDrive. This file is often a compressed archive, sometimes password-protected, to evade security filters.
  3. Execution: Upon extracting and opening the file, the victim inadvertently executes malware disguised as legitimate documents, such as contracts or promotional materials.
  4. System Compromise: Once executed, the malware installs on the victim's system, enabling attackers to steal sensitive information, including login credentials, financial data, and browser cookies. It may also provide remote access to the victim’s device.

Diagram: Attack Flow

The following diagram illustrates the attack flow:

    +------------------+
    |  Fake Brand      |
    |  Collaboration   |
    |  Email           |
    +------------------+
             |
             v
    +------------------+
    |  Malicious       |
    |  Attachment      |
    |  (e.g., ZIP file)|
    +------------------+
             |
             v
    +------------------+
    |  Victim          |
    |  Downloads and   |
    |  Opens File      |
    +------------------+
             |
             v
    +------------------+
    |  Malware         |
    |  Execution       |
    +------------------+
             |
             v
    +------------------+
    |  System          |
    |  Compromise      |
    +------------------+

Notable Cases

Several instances have been reported where YouTube creators fell victim to such schemes. For example, in December 2024, a surge in phishing campaigns targeted YouTube creators with fake brand collaboration offers, leading to account takeovers and unauthorized access to sensitive information.

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

Security researchers have identified specific indicators associated with these attacks:

  • Malicious Domains: Examples include vm95039.vps.client-server.site:27105.
  • Malware Hashes: For instance, 564de0f055afa822add5e46761cba0c422f6a5e060ab7d2133599d8759598d50 (SHA-256).
  • Malicious Files: Executables disguised as documents, such as Digital Agreement Terms and Payments Comprehensive Evaluation.exe.

Mitigation Strategies

To safeguard against such threats, content creators should:

  • Verify Authenticity: Independently confirm the legitimacy of collaboration offers by contacting the brand through official channels.
  • Exercise Caution with Attachments: Avoid downloading or opening files from unsolicited emails, especially compressed or password-protected archives.
  • Implement Security Measures: Use reputable antivirus software, enable multi-factor authentication, and regularly update passwords.
  • Stay Informed: Keep abreast of the latest phishing tactics and cybersecurity best practices to recognize and avoid potential threats.

Conclusion

The exploitation of fake brand collaborations represents a significant threat to YouTube creators. By understanding the attack vectors and implementing robust security measures, creators can protect their channels and personal information from malicious actors.

References

Back to Posts
// This is the updated banner script block with corrected ID selectors