🟡 CVE-2025-4021: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-4020: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-32472: The multiScan and picoScan are... 🟡 CVE-2025-4019: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-4018: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-4017: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4016: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4015: A vulnerability was found in 2... 🟡 CVE-2025-4014: A vulnerability was found in P... 🔥 CVE-2025-3200: An unauthenticated remote atta... 🟡 CVE-2025-4013: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4012: A vulnerability was found in p... 🟡 CVE-2025-4011: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-42598: Multiple SEIKO EPSON printer d... 🟡 CVE-2025-39367: Missing Authorization vulnerab... 🟢 CVE-2025-32471: The device’s passwords have no... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32470: A remote unauthenticated attac... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4007: A vulnerability classified as ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-22235: EndpointRequest.to() creates a... 🟡 CVE-2025-4006: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4005: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4004: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4003: A vulnerability was found in R... 🟡 CVE-2025-4002: A vulnerability was found in R... 🟡 CVE-2025-4001: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-4000: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3999: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3998: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3997: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3996: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3706: The eHRMS from 104 Corporation... 🟡 CVE-2025-3995: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3994: A vulnerability was found in T... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3993: A vulnerability was found in T... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3992: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3991: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-31144: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... ⚠️ CVE-2025-27937: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... 🔥 CVE-2025-26692: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3990: A vulnerability, which was cla... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3989: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-46690: Ververica Platform 2.14.0 allo... 🟡 CVE-2025-46689: Ververica Platform 2.14.0 cont... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3988: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3987: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3986: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-3985: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-46688: quickjs-ng through 0.9.0 has a... 🟡 CVE-2025-46687: quickjs-ng through 0.9.0 has a... 🟢 CVE-2025-3984: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-3983: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3982: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3981: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟢 CVE-2025-2866: Improper Verification of Crypt... 🟡 CVE-2025-3980: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3979: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3978: A vulnerability was found in d... 🟡 CVE-2025-3977: A vulnerability was found in i... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46657: Karaz Karazal through 2025-04-... 🟡 CVE-2025-3976: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-3975: A vulnerability was found in S... 🟡 CVE-2025-3974: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3973: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3972: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3971: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3970: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3969: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-3968: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-3967: A vulnerability was found in i... 🟡 CVE-2025-3886: An issue in CatoNetworks CatoC... 🟡 CVE-2025-3966: A vulnerability was found in i... 🟡 CVE-2025-3965: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3964: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3963: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2024-52888: For an authenticated end-user ... 🟢 CVE-2024-52887: Authenticated end-user may set... 🟡 CVE-2025-3962: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3961: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3960: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3959: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3958: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3957: A vulnerability was found in o... 🟡 CVE-2025-3956: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46580: There is a code-related vulner... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46579: There is a DDE injection vulne... 🟡 CVE-2025-46578: There are SQL injection vulner... 🟡 CVE-2025-46577: There is a SQL injection vulne... 🟡 CVE-2025-46576: There is a Permission Manageme... 🟡 CVE-2025-46575: There is an information disclo... 🟡 CVE-2025-46574: There is an information disclo... 🟢 CVE-2025-46675: In NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2... 🟢 CVE-2025-46674: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 us... 🟡 CVE-2025-46673: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 do... 🟢 CVE-2025-46672: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 do... 🟡 CVE-2025-3955: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟢 CVE-2025-46656: python-markdownify (aka markdo... 🟡 CVE-2025-3954: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-46655: CodiMD through 2.5.4 has a CSP... 🟡 CVE-2025-46654: CodiMD through 2.2.0 has a CSP... 🟢 CVE-2025-46653: Formidable (aka node-formidabl...
FTC Mandates Security Overhaul for GoDaddy Following Data Breaches

FTC Mandates Security Overhaul for GoDaddy Following Data Breaches

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has directed web hosting provider GoDaddy to implement a comprehensive information security program. This action addresses allegations that the company failed to secure its website-hosting services, leaving customers and their website visitors vulnerable to cyber threats.

Background of the FTC's Action

Since 2018, GoDaddy has allegedly neglected to implement adequate safeguards to monitor and protect its hosting environments against potential attacks. The FTC also accuses the company of misleading its customers by overstating the security measures in place and misrepresenting its compliance with frameworks like the European Union (EU)-US and Swiss-US Privacy Shield agreements, which require companies to take reasonable steps to protect personal data.

Details of the Security Breaches

Between 2019 and 2022, GoDaddy experienced multiple security breaches:

  • In 2019, attackers gained unauthorized access to approximately 28,000 hosting accounts.
  • In 2021, a breach impacted up to 1.2 million WordPress customers, exposing email addresses, phone numbers, admin passwords, SSL keys, and sFTP credentials.
  • In 2023, the company disclosed a multi-year breach where attackers stole source code, installed malware, and redirected customer websites.

FTC's Settlement Requirements

Under the proposed settlement, GoDaddy is required to:

  • Implement a comprehensive information security program designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and security of its website-hosting services.
  • Refrain from making misleading claims about its security measures or compliance with privacy standards, including government and industry frameworks such as the Privacy Shield agreements.
  • Engage an independent third-party assessor to evaluate its security program, with an initial review followed by assessments every two years to ensure compliance with the settlement terms.

Implications for the Industry

This action by the FTC underscores the critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures for web hosting providers. Millions of companies, particularly small businesses, rely on these services to secure their online presence. The FTC's intervention aims to ensure that companies like GoDaddy bolster their security systems to protect consumers globally.

Conclusion

The FTC's directive serves as a reminder for all web hosting providers to prioritize cybersecurity and maintain transparency with their customers regarding data protection measures. Implementing comprehensive security programs and adhering to privacy standards are essential steps in safeguarding user data and maintaining trust in digital services.

Sources

Back to Posts