🟡 CVE-2025-4021: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-4020: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-32472: The multiScan and picoScan are... 🟡 CVE-2025-4019: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-4018: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-4017: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4016: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4015: A vulnerability was found in 2... 🟡 CVE-2025-4014: A vulnerability was found in P... 🔥 CVE-2025-3200: An unauthenticated remote atta... 🟡 CVE-2025-4013: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4012: A vulnerability was found in p... 🟡 CVE-2025-4011: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-42598: Multiple SEIKO EPSON printer d... 🟡 CVE-2025-39367: Missing Authorization vulnerab... 🟢 CVE-2025-32471: The device’s passwords have no... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32470: A remote unauthenticated attac... ⚠️ CVE-2025-4007: A vulnerability classified as ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-22235: EndpointRequest.to() creates a... 🟡 CVE-2025-4006: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-4005: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4004: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-4003: A vulnerability was found in R... 🟡 CVE-2025-4002: A vulnerability was found in R... 🟡 CVE-2025-4001: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-4000: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3999: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3998: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3997: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3996: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3706: The eHRMS from 104 Corporation... 🟡 CVE-2025-3995: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3994: A vulnerability was found in T... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3993: A vulnerability was found in T... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3992: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3991: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-31144: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... ⚠️ CVE-2025-27937: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... 🔥 CVE-2025-26692: Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3990: A vulnerability, which was cla... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3989: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-46690: Ververica Platform 2.14.0 allo... 🟡 CVE-2025-46689: Ververica Platform 2.14.0 cont... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3988: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3987: A vulnerability was found in T... 🟡 CVE-2025-3986: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-3985: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-46688: quickjs-ng through 0.9.0 has a... 🟡 CVE-2025-46687: quickjs-ng through 0.9.0 has a... 🟢 CVE-2025-3984: A vulnerability was found in A... 🟡 CVE-2025-3983: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3982: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3981: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟢 CVE-2025-2866: Improper Verification of Crypt... 🟡 CVE-2025-3980: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3979: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3978: A vulnerability was found in d... 🟡 CVE-2025-3977: A vulnerability was found in i... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46657: Karaz Karazal through 2025-04-... 🟡 CVE-2025-3976: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-3975: A vulnerability was found in S... 🟡 CVE-2025-3974: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3973: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3972: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3971: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3970: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3969: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-3968: A vulnerability was found in c... 🟡 CVE-2025-3967: A vulnerability was found in i... 🟡 CVE-2025-3886: An issue in CatoNetworks CatoC... 🟡 CVE-2025-3966: A vulnerability was found in i... 🟡 CVE-2025-3965: A vulnerability has been found... 🟡 CVE-2025-3964: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3963: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2024-52888: For an authenticated end-user ... 🟢 CVE-2024-52887: Authenticated end-user may set... 🟡 CVE-2025-3962: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3961: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3960: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3959: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3958: A vulnerability was found in w... 🟡 CVE-2025-3957: A vulnerability was found in o... 🟡 CVE-2025-3956: A vulnerability has been found... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46580: There is a code-related vulner... ⚠️ CVE-2025-46579: There is a DDE injection vulne... 🟡 CVE-2025-46578: There are SQL injection vulner... 🟡 CVE-2025-46577: There is a SQL injection vulne... 🟡 CVE-2025-46576: There is a Permission Manageme... 🟡 CVE-2025-46575: There is an information disclo... 🟡 CVE-2025-46574: There is an information disclo... 🟢 CVE-2025-46675: In NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2... 🟢 CVE-2025-46674: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 us... 🟡 CVE-2025-46673: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 do... 🟢 CVE-2025-46672: NASA CryptoLib before 1.3.2 do... 🟡 CVE-2025-3955: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟢 CVE-2025-46656: python-markdownify (aka markdo... 🟡 CVE-2025-3954: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-46655: CodiMD through 2.5.4 has a CSP... 🟡 CVE-2025-46654: CodiMD through 2.2.0 has a CSP... 🟢 CVE-2025-46653: Formidable (aka node-formidabl...
What is Glassbridge and Why It’s Important that Google Exposed It

What is Glassbridge and Why It’s Important that Google Exposed It

Glassbridge refers to a network of fake news websites identified by Google, which were part of a larger, coordinated influence campaign primarily orchestrated by Chinese entities. These sites masqueraded as legitimate local news outlets, targeting audiences in various regions such as Asia, Europe, and the Americas. They aimed to spread narratives favorable to the Chinese government, often focusing on issues such as Taiwan\'s political situation, territorial disputes in the South China Sea, and other topics that align with Chinese foreign policy. By presenting themselves as credible news sources, these websites created the illusion of impartial journalism while pushing a politically charged agenda.

The Glassbridge operation is notable for its use of sophisticated tactics. The actors behind it bulk-created hundreds of websites that mixed content from state-controlled Chinese media with repurposed regional news. This allowed the network to appear as though it were independent, localized journalism, when in fact it was part of a broader effort to manipulate public opinion. The network didn't just rely on traditional website creation; it also employed freelance platforms like Fiverr to distribute content across social media, further amplifying the reach of their propaganda. The use of these platforms made it difficult for casual observers to trace the origins of the messages being spread, providing the perpetrators with a degree of plausible deniability.

Google’s decision to expose this network is significant for several reasons. First, it demonstrates the growing complexity of information operations in the digital age. Traditionally, influence campaigns have been associated with social media, but as Glassbridge shows, fake news can now be spread through entire networks of seemingly legitimate news sites. This shift poses a major challenge for both users and platform providers who must find ways to detect and prevent such inauthentic content.

Second, the exposure of Glassbridge underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability in the digital ecosystem. By identifying and blocking these inauthentic websites, Google is not only taking steps to protect users from misleading information but also sending a strong message about the importance of maintaining the integrity of online news. The rapid spread of misinformation can have serious consequences, including influencing elections, undermining trust in democratic institutions, and manipulating public perceptions on critical global issues. Therefore, Google’s proactive approach in exposing these tactics is a welcome step in ensuring the credibility of information available on its platform.

Finally, Glassbridge serves as a reminder of the broader geopolitical context in which these digital influence campaigns operate. The use of misinformation and disinformation as tools of statecraft is becoming increasingly common, with actors from not just China, but also Russia and Iran, engaging in similar tactics. The efforts by Google to uncover and shut down these operations are crucial in protecting the integrity of public discourse across the world, especially as people increasingly turn to digital platforms for news.

In conclusion, the exposure of Glassbridge by Google is an important move in the ongoing battle against digital misinformation. By shedding light on the complex and sophisticated methods used by these foreign influence networks, Google is helping to safeguard the credibility of online information. This is a critical step in the effort to maintain trust in digital platforms and ensure that people have access to authentic, reliable news sources in an increasingly digital world.

Sources:

  1. SiliconANGLE, "Google identifies coordinated network of inauthentic news sites in Glassbridge investigation"
  2. The New York Times, "Google Exposes Global Disinformation Network Behind Glassbridge"
Back to Posts